|
August 2005 |
|
“As the number of objects in Earth orbit increases, the likelihood of accidental collisions will also increase. Currently, hundreds of close approaches (i.e.,
passes within less than 1 kilometer) between cataloged objects occur on a daily basis. If future spacecraft and rocket bodies are not removed from LEO within a moderate amount of time after
then end of a mission, e.g., within 25 years, the rate of accidental collisions will increase markedly later in the this century.”
“The Orbital Debris Quarterly News,” April 2005, NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex. Space-faring nations are well aware of the dangers caused by space debris – from inactive satellites to discarded rocket stages to nuts and bolts left in orbit. Space debris is the inevitable consequence of the global uses of space; every space launch will create some amount and form of debris, just as every kind of transportation on Earth creates some amount and form of pollution. Even tiny pieces of debris such as paint flecks or bolts can damage or destroy a satellite or spacecraft, due to the tremendously high speeds of orbital objects (some 10 kilometers per second in Low Earth Orbit). Space scientists universally agree there is already too much orbital debris, particularly in the most heavily used orbits. Unfortunately, the amount of space debris is increasing rather than decreasing as more nations and commercial entities seek the economic and military benefits provided by satellites. Indeed, space debris is now of such a concern that there is an effort underway, with NASA playing a leading role, to create U.N.-sanctioned international guidelines for space operators designed to minimize the creation of debris during routine space operations. For these reasons, it is worrisome that the U.S. Air Force, in its efforts to establish what the service terms as “space dominance” and “space control,” is considering the possible uses of anti-satellite weapons (ASATs) that would create vast amounts of space debris. U.S. Air Force documents envision “disabling” or “destroying” enemy satellites using air-launched missiles and ground- and space-based ASATs that would shatter their targets into many bits through high-speed impacts, as well as ground-, air- and space-based laser systems that would “toast” a satellite into a giant hunk of space junk. At a time when scientists are already concerned that failure to slow current rates of debris creation could result in parts of space becoming too dangerous for satellites to use, Air Force plans to include debris-creating weapons in its space control arsenal seem short-sighted at the least, and deliberately negligent at the worst. Given that the U.S. military is the world’s largest consumer of space-provided data and services, from communications to Earth imagery to precision-guidance for weapons provided by the U.S. Global Positioning System satellite network, and thus has the most to lose in space, the Air Force should reconsider this dangerous strategy. Some Basic Facts about Space Debris
|
|
|